Not quite sure what I’m supposed to look up in a dictionary. I guess this is the part of the response that returns to the rant mode. You see, no one is claiming it is complicated. It’s just that our opinions differ.

Get over it. Move on; I know I have

you may choose to have a short memory about sheffield united. some of “us” don t have a short memory about it, and want to see mcccabe pay a steep penalty for spreading out and lies, for grossly distorting the facts , and for wasting a lot of west ham s time and money on arbitration after arbitration.

the club, quite rightly ,has already indicated it will consider taking legal action against mccabe.
why? because he s done reputational damage to the west ham “brand” well above and beyond the 5.5 million quid fine. and because in damaging the club s reputation further and subjecting us to quadruple jeopardy ,mccabe made it very difficult for us to bring in new players . which of course leads some disgruntled fans to then fault curbishley, when it is nt curbishley s fault.

so sheffield united is very much in the “now” and in the ‘near future”, because as even the club s owners have acknowledged mccabe should be made to pay . the “vitriol” and the “rantings” are derived frolm mccabe. you might not find meaning in it , and thats your business. but many of us would find meaning in mccabe being made to pay a price for hus libelous actions.

not that complicated, really.

look it up in a dictionary

1. If SU get awarded compo, then of course no one is going to be happy about it. I am simply putting the case for ceasing the meaningless and vitriolic rantings of some who appera, to me at any rate, to be keeping this whole thing so much more alive than is justified.
2. What exactly is a ‘comquat’?
3. If by defending publications that misrepresent west ham you mean the Mail, I didn’t. I simply believe that by continuing to bang on about it, you give ever greater credence to the nonsense they print.

it isn t over til it s over, comquat. let s hope it is , but we re not 100 percent financially in the clear yet. as and when we are, THEN it can consigned to history.

and stop defending publications that rubbish and misrepresent west ham. any part of that you can t grasp?

Seemed to touch a nerve tho, eh what??

No, go on, keep on banging on about SU and all that old game. Some of us have consined it to the dustbin of history and want to concentrate on the now and the future.

blimey

am i being stupid but what has changed and what does the big egg want to do now little egg has ‘stepped down’?

help!

yes ,you re honest. and tony blair s a saint.